It is a phenomenal piece of work but it does have an unfinished feel to it.
Darryl Mclean who was largely responsible for Chapter 12 made the point that, “Adrienne would never have published (it) as is. She got to version 2.0, needed 4.0 before she’d have been happy. She did the baseline research, never fully got through analysis.”
In my last meeting with her, just a few weeks before she died we discussed some of the issues that are currently bedevilling the recognition of learning in and for the workplace. We couldn’t complete the conversation at the time and were going to discuss it at a later date, as I’m sure she would have done with the other people who contributed.
This is the first full version of the European classification of Skills, Competences, Occupations and Qualifications (ESCO).
It identifies and categorises skills, competences, qualifications and occupations relevant for the EU labour market and related education and training. It systematically shows the relationships between the different aspects.
This what we (Dept. of Labour Task Team) envisaged the OFO could become when we started developing it in 2005/6. We were ahead of the curve then. We were sharply criticised at the time for trying to create an alternative NQF (i.e. an alternative to the NSBs and learning fields).
The EU tool shows what rigorous development can achieve. ESCO is based on ISCO ’88, as was the OFO from version 2010 onwards. It seems to have been developed at unit group level (4 digits) rather than at occupational level (6 digits). So each group contains quite lengthy lists of related occupations and specialisations
What seems to be really well done is how the skills, competencies, knowledge etc have been cross- referenced across occupations and how it deals with transversal skills.
For those who are interested in skills development this is an immense source of information. The should speed up the development of occupational qualifications – Qualification Development Facilitators and working groups can use this as one of the starting points.